Jury

Awards

Andrew Ashton, Juror

Work, Art, Life, VIC

View Judges Choice

Shannon Bell, Juror

Re:, NSW

View Judges Choice

Jane Cameron, Juror

Fête Press, SA

View Judges Choice

Danielle de Andrade, Juror

Garbett, NSW

View Judges Choice

Clem Devine, Juror

Jasmax, NZ

View Judges Choice

Rob Duncan, Juror

Mucho, USA

View Judges Choice

Nicole Liedberg, Juror

Self, NSW

View Judges Choice

Angela McCarthy, Juror

am creative, NSW

View Judges Choice

Fabio Ongarato, Juror

Fabio Ongarato Design, VIC

View Judges Choice

Matthew Remphrey, Juror

Parallax Design, SA

View Judges Choice

Rachel Terkelsen, Juror

PUSH, VIC

View Judges Choice

Kylie Timpani, Juror

Humaan, WA

View Judges Choice

Specialist

Dan Agostino, Juror

The Brand Agency, WA

To be named

Scott Geersen, Juror

Substance, NSW

Despina Macris, Juror

dotdash, QLD

To be named

Lindsay Tucker, Juror

Katarzyna Group, QLD

Sonia Uznadze, Juror

Re:, NSW

Kieran Wallis, Juror

Voice, SA

Volunteers

Awards Volunteers, Juror

AGDA, SA

View Judges Choice

Criteria

The three main criteria for assessment of entries, as briefed to the Jury members, are as follows:

— Innovative expression of an idea (creativity)
— Execution of the concept (craft)
— Relevance to the intended audience (communication).

Specialist categories such as Design Effectiveness and Design for Good have additional aspects to the work such as Business and Social impact.

Method

The jury is assembled in a warehouse for three days to assess the work, with some follow up reviews done remotely. Jurors sit across multiple categories based on their particular speciality. The jury is guided by a group of Jury foremen who are the AGDA representatives during the process. The foremen are responsible for keeping the jury on task and to quickly assess any issues with the entries. 

Scoring

Each juror gives an entry a score out of 100. The scores are then averaged across the jury for each entry. Jurors have the opportunity to adjust their scores after a groups discussion on highlighted work. We use the Olympic Method for calculating scores, where the lowest and highest scores are excluded from the average.

Anomaly scores

Jury members are given the opportunity to review any anomaly scores on each entry. An anomaly score is one that is significantly different to the mean average.

Anonymity

All entries are presented anonymously to the jury, all references to the designers, studios and collaborators are hidden during the assessment period.

Juror entries

AGDA allows jurors to enter their own studio’s work into the awards because we have the utmost faith in our process to maintain the integrity of the results. Jurors are excluded from scoring their own work, or any work that they have collaborated on. Jurors are expected to refrain from advocating for their own work or work that they have collaborated on within jury discussions.

Plagiarism

Any concerns about plagiarism are raised by jury members discreetly to the foremen who will investigate on behalf of the jury member who raised the issue. Jury members are asked to refrain from raising these concerns to the group until AGDA has finalised its investigation.

Login

Your Awards PIN is not the same as your Membership password. Upon creation it is your email address, but you will be prompted to change it to a 4 digit PIN upon first login.

Register

Register to become a Website member and/or complete your registration to become an official AGDA member.

Find out more

Lapsed Members / New Members

If you have just renewed your membership, or have joined for the first time please allow 1 business day for your login to be enabled.

If you have any difficulties or have more questions regarding login, please check out FAQs